HostFUSE vs NES — price, size and safety, side by side
FUSE (Ethereum) vs NES (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
FUSE vs NES — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| FUSE | NES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000558 | $0.0003344 |
| Market cap | $2.02M | $75.57K |
| 24h volume | $1.55M DEX | $71.64 DEX |
| Liquidity | $326.08K | $264.43K |
| FDV | $2.02M | $111.63K |
| Holders | 1,626 | 28,890 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 50 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FUSE measures ~27× the market cap of NES
- FUSE measures ~21,654× the 24h volume of NES
- NES measures ~18× the holder count of FUSE
- over the shared window FUSE moved −82.2% while NES moved −99.8%
What the data says
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our October 6, 2026 read shows $264 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUSE or NES?
By tracked market cap: FUSE (Ethereum) measures $2.02M and NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUSE or NES?
On the contract checks we publish: FUSE (Ethereum) grades A and NES (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUSE and NES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show FUSE at −82.2% and NES at −99.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.