HostFWUSDB vs BLADE — price, size and safety, side by side
FWUSDB (Blast) vs BLADE (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
FWUSDB vs BLADE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| FWUSDB | BLADE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9842 | $0.0002108 |
| Market cap | — | $28.30K |
| 24h volume | $1.24K DEX | $68.05 DEX |
| Liquidity | $34.13K | $15.69K |
| FDV | $14.72M | $49.86K |
| Holders | 5,191 | 15,720 |
| Age (days) | 954 | 886 |
| Safety grade | E | B |
Where they differ
- FWUSDB measures ~2.2× the liquidity of BLADE
- FWUSDB measures ~18× the 24h volume of BLADE
- BLADE measures ~3.0× the holder count of FWUSDB
- over the shared window FWUSDB moved −0.97% while BLADE moved −16.5%
What the data says
FWUSDB
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on FWUSDB. The mint function on FWUSDB's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which means the team can still create new supply. Until that changes, FWUSDB stays around 34/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, FWUSDB is showing $34.13K of on-chain liquidity, 5,191 holders and an established 954-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $34.13K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 5,191 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FWUSDB as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
BLADE
One detail on BLADE didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where BLADE stands today: a $15.69K pool, 15,720 wallets holding and an established record at 886 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $28.30K in market cap, the $15.69K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 15,720-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of BLADE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FWUSDB or BLADE?
By tracked market cap: FWUSDB (Blast) measures — and BLADE (Blast) measures $28.30K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FWUSDB or BLADE?
On the contract checks we publish: FWUSDB (Blast) grades E and BLADE (Blast) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FWUSDB and BLADE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show FWUSDB at −0.97% and BLADE at −16.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.