HostFWWETH vs CBBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
FWWETH (Ethereum) vs CBBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
FWWETH vs CBBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| FWWETH | CBBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.42K | $81.40K |
| Market cap | — | $7.87B |
| 24h volume | $6.38M DEX | $16.02M DEX |
| Liquidity | $213.41M | $77.45M |
| FDV | $268.05M | $3.69B |
| Holders | 244 | 89,170 |
| Age (days) | 536 | 386 |
| Safety grade | E | B |
Where they differ
- FWWETH measures ~2.8× the liquidity of CBBTC
- CBBTC measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of FWWETH
- CBBTC measures ~365× the holder count of FWWETH
- over the shared window FWWETH moved −1.30% while CBBTC moved +4.50%
What the data says
FWWETH
FWWETH shows the same wrapped-wrapper shape as its Bitcoin-named sibling: about $213 million of tracked pool liquidity in our October 9, 2026 snapshot — impressive depth for a token whose brand leaves almost no public trail — against roughly $5 million of recorded daily volume. That turnover is livelier than its sibling's but still thin against depth of that claimed size, and on an asset this opaque the figure deserves skepticism rather than credit.
Mechanically this is a claim on wrapped ETH, meaning the holder sits two contracts away from Ether: WETH itself, plus whatever wrapper contract issued this receipt at 0xa250cc729bb3323e7933022a67b52200fe354767. Each layer is a custody you inherit — the wrapper's mint powers, redemption mechanics, and owner controls are what actually determine safety, and our market-structure snapshot assessed none of them. The B grade describes the pool's shape; it says nothing about whether the claim behind it is honored.
CBBTC
CBBTC — "Coinbase Wrapped BTC" on Ethereum, 0xcbb7c0000ab88b473b1f5afd9ef808440eed33bf — is Coinbase's custodied bitcoin wrapper: each unit a claim on BTC held by the exchange's custody arm.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $77.4 million of liquidity against an $8.06 billion market cap, roughly $5.7 million of daily volume, at an $81,540 unit price that tracks BTC spot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FWWETH or CBBTC?
By tracked market cap: FWWETH (Ethereum) measures — and CBBTC (Ethereum) measures $7.87B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FWWETH or CBBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: FWWETH (Ethereum) grades E and CBBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FWWETH and CBBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show FWWETH at −1.30% and CBBTC at +4.50%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.