HostG vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
G (Ethereum) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
G vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| G | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003892 | $0.0001277 |
| Market cap | $45.30M | $438.50K |
| 24h volume | $2.25M DEX | $986.53K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.41M | $83.02K |
| FDV | $76.80M | $715.42K |
| Holders | 26,754 | 7,706 |
| Age (days) | 795 | 6 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- G measures ~103× the market cap of 果蝇
- G measures ~17× the liquidity of 果蝇
- G measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- G measures ~3.5× the holder count of 果蝇
- over the shared window G moved −37.9% while 果蝇 moved −82.2%
What the data says
G
G — "Gravity" on Ethereum, 0x9c7beba8f6ef6643abd725e45a4e8387ef260649 — is a single-letter ticker token carrying a $45.3 million market cap in the tracked book.
The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $1.4 million of liquidity, roughly $2.2 million of daily volume, at a $0.0063 unit price — daily turnover larger than the pool itself.
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
FAQ
Which is bigger, G or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: G (Ethereum) measures $45.30M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, G or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: G (Ethereum) grades B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have G and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show G at −37.9% and 果蝇 at −82.2%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.