HostGHST vs OPENAI — price, size and safety, side by side
GHST (Base) vs OPENAI (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-10-02.
GHST vs OPENAI — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-28
| GHST | OPENAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1014 | $0.0000009391 |
| Market cap | — | $2.55M |
| 24h volume | $3.20M DEX | $24.07M DEX |
| Liquidity | $16.50M | $9.03M |
| FDV | $396.29M | $2.55M |
| Holders | 31 | 5,065 |
| Age (days) | 237 | 0 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GHST measures ~1.8× the liquidity of OPENAI
- OPENAI measures ~7.5× the 24h volume of GHST
- OPENAI measures ~163× the holder count of GHST
- over the shared window GHST moved 0.00% while OPENAI moved +102%
What the data says
GHST
Start with the discrepancy, because on this row it is the useful part: the venue feed names this Base deployment "So4," while the ticker and slug in our index carry GHST — the name Aavegotchi's long-running game token trades under. At 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8, our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads about $16.5 million of tracked pool liquidity against roughly $3.2 million of recorded daily volume — a working level of turnover for a mid-cap game token.
Name mismatches between a feed and an index happen for boring reasons (a token rebrands upstream, a feed carries a different label) and for dangerous ones (a different asset wearing a famous ticker). The address is the arbiter: Aavegotchi's GHST is a known, years-old deployment, and whether this contract is the genuine Base deployment or an impersonation riding the name is a fact the address — never the ticker — settles. The live scanner above reads the contract directly and is the fastest way to confirm which case this is.
OPENAI
OPENAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (90/100, 2026-10-09).
On the trading data, OPENAI shows deep liquidity of $9.03M, 5,065 wallets holding and a brand-new 0-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $2.55M in market cap, the $9.03M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 5,065-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OPENAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHST or OPENAI?
By tracked market cap: GHST (Base) measures — and OPENAI (Base) measures $2.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHST or OPENAI?
On the contract checks we publish: GHST (Base) grades A and OPENAI (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHST and OPENAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-28, the measured snapshots show GHST at 0.00% and OPENAI at +102%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-28; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.