HostGMT vs TEL — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Polygon) vs TEL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
GMT vs TEL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| GMT | TEL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007546 | $0.001777 |
| Market cap | $25.94M | $191.37M |
| 24h volume | $30.20K DEX | $29.87K DEX |
| Liquidity | $621.92K | $553.42K |
| FDV | $16.23M | $75.21M |
| Holders | 46,298 | 33,701 |
| Age (days) | 963 | 1,682 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- TEL measures ~7.4× the market cap of GMT
- over the shared window GMT moved −9.48% while TEL moved +10.0%
What the data says
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The October 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
TEL
TEL at 0xdf7837de1f2fa4631d716cf2502f8b230f1dcc32 is Telcoin's remittance asset in its PoS-bridged Polygon form — the payments token aimed at telecom corridors, carried to the chain where its retail flow actually trades. The October 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $191.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $75.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float — 38.3 billion units sitting on this chain.
The book is honest mid-cap shape: $553 thousand of tracked pool depth is workable for the size, on $72.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working tape rather than a churn chart. The deployment is 327 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or TEL?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M and TEL (Polygon) measures $191.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or TEL?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Polygon) grades B and TEL (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and TEL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show GMT at −9.48% and TEL at +10.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.