HostGNO vs NES — price, size and safety, side by side
GNO (Gnosis) vs NES (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
GNO vs NES — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| GNO | NES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $114.84 | $0.0003344 |
| Market cap | $305.06M | $75.57K |
| 24h volume | $130.50K DEX | $71.64 DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.54M | $264.43K |
| FDV | $166.99M | $111.63K |
| Holders | 38,619 | 28,890 |
| Age (days) | 151 | 50 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~4,037× the market cap of NES
- GNO measures ~9.6× the liquidity of NES
- GNO measures ~1,822× the 24h volume of NES
- over the shared window GNO moved −0.63% while NES moved −45.5%
What the data says
GNO
One detail on GNO didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, GNO shows a $2.54M pool, 38,619 wallets holding and a maturing record at 151 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $2.54M pool against a ~$305.06M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so GNO's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. 38,619 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our October 6, 2026 read shows $264 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNO or NES?
By tracked market cap: GNO (Gnosis) measures $305.06M and NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNO or NES?
On the contract checks we publish: GNO (Gnosis) grades B and NES (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNO and NES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show GNO at −0.63% and NES at −45.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.