HostGNO vs WXDAI — price, size and safety, side by side
GNO (Gnosis) vs WXDAI (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
GNO vs WXDAI — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| GNO | WXDAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $114.84 | $0.998 |
| Market cap | $305.06M | $44.66M |
| 24h volume | $130.50K DEX | $403.87K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.54M | $852.73K |
| FDV | $166.99M | $44.58M |
| Holders | 38,619 | 46,329 |
| Age (days) | 151 | 564 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~6.8× the market cap of WXDAI
- GNO measures ~3.0× the liquidity of WXDAI
- WXDAI measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of GNO
What the data says
GNO
One detail on GNO didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, GNO shows a $2.54M pool, 38,619 wallets holding and a maturing record at 151 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $2.54M pool against a ~$305.06M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so GNO's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. 38,619 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
WXDAI
WXDAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why WXDAI earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On liquidity and holders, WXDAI shows workable liquidity of $852.73K, a holder base of 46,329 and 564 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $44.66M, the $852.73K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 46,329-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created WXDAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNO or WXDAI?
By tracked market cap: GNO (Gnosis) measures $305.06M and WXDAI (Gnosis) measures $44.66M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNO or WXDAI?
On the contract checks we publish: GNO (Gnosis) grades B and WXDAI (Gnosis) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNO and WXDAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show GNO at −0.63% and WXDAI at +0.05%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.