HostGNS vs ZRO — price, size and safety, side by side
GNS (Arbitrum) vs ZRO (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
GNS vs ZRO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| GNS | ZRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4578 | $1.95 |
| Market cap | $11.60M | $815.18M |
| 24h volume | $21.37K DEX | $2.00M DEX |
| Liquidity | $213.78K | $302.91K |
| FDV | $8.18M | $12.41M |
| Holders | 14,134 | 448,955 |
| Age (days) | 832 | 176 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~70× the market cap of GNS
- ZRO measures ~94× the 24h volume of GNS
- ZRO measures ~32× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window GNS moved +3.75% while ZRO moved +58.0%
What the data says
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $815.2 million market cap towers over the $12.4 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $302.9 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNS or ZRO?
By tracked market cap: GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M and ZRO (Base) measures $815.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNS or ZRO?
On the contract checks we publish: GNS (Arbitrum) grades D and ZRO (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNS and ZRO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show GNS at +3.75% and ZRO at +58.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.