HostGOHM vs LINK.E — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs LINK.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
GOHM vs LINK.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| GOHM | LINK.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.39K | $12.39 |
| Market cap | — | $9.64B |
| 24h volume | $3.54K DEX | $7.12K DEX |
| Liquidity | $110.82K | $89.47K |
| FDV | $3.42M | $4.65M |
| Holders | 7,457 | 13,087 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | 1,121 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of GOHM
- LINK.E measures ~1.8× the holder count of GOHM
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the October 9, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a fully diluted valuation of $3.4 million, against $110.8 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $4.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $89.5 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or LINK.E?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $9.64B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or LINK.E?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and LINK.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show GOHM at −1.54% and LINK.E at −4.56%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.