HostGUN vs BEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
GUN (Avalanche) vs BEAR (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
GUN vs BEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| GUN | BEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002482 | $0.00000003501 |
| Market cap | $11.24M | — |
| 24h volume | $7.67K DEX | $0.00 DEX |
| Liquidity | $20.29K | $4.81K |
| FDV | $2.16M | $16.17K |
| Holders | 5,725 | 5,263 |
| Age (days) | 535 | 1,018 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- GUN measures ~4.2× the liquidity of BEAR
- over the shared window GUN moved −23.3% while BEAR moved −51.5%
What the data says
GUN
GUN — the GUNZ network token — is a 535-day-old Avalanche asset at 0x26debd39d5ed069770406fca10a0e4f8d2c743eb, priced at a $11.2 million market cap across 5,725 wallets on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
Two flags do the talking: the contract sits behind a proxy, so its logic is upgradeable after the fact, and the top ten wallets hold about 80.3% of the supply — a heavily concentrated float. The venue side is the third caveat: $20.3 thousand of tracked liquidity is a vestige against the cap, so the token is far more widely held than it is tradably deep.
BEAR
BEAR is a 1,018-day-old Avalanche token at 0x19c79f282d151995d91f6dbdda2739701f9c47aa — nearly three years in — priced at a $16.2 thousand fully diluted valuation across 5,263 wallets on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The book has collapsed to a vestige: $4.8 thousand of tracked liquidity against a $16.2 thousand valuation, and the contract kept one live lever — it can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 51.1%, meaning even a five-figure valuation is half-held by ten addresses. The grade is C at 60 — the snapshot's honest sum of thin venue, live mint, and concentrated float.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GUN or BEAR?
By tracked market cap: GUN (Avalanche) measures $11.24M and BEAR (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GUN or BEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: GUN (Avalanche) grades B and BEAR (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GUN and BEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show GUN at −23.3% and BEAR at −51.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.