HostH vs QNT — price, size and safety, side by side
H (Ethereum) vs QNT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
H vs QNT — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| H | QNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05675 | $200.93 |
| Market cap | $157.99M | $3.82B |
| 24h volume | $1.55M DEX | $1.78M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.19M | $1.17M |
| FDV | $787.33M | $11.93B |
| Holders | 183,204 | 183,572 |
| Age (days) | 5 | 600 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- QNT measures ~24× the market cap of H
- over the shared window H moved −17.9% while QNT moved −23.6%
What the data says
H
H is Humanity Protocol's token — a palm-scan proof-of-personhood network, one of the "prove you're human without a government ID" projects that the AI era made fashionable. The contract 0xe76c5b78f93909d34404e9eb4c1f19e7582a5de1 is what our scan tracks, at $1.2 million of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest note: personhood tokens are a bet on two unproven things at once — that the biometric approach wins the Sybil-resistance market, and that the token captures the win. Biometric systems also carry a non-deletable risk shape: a leaked palm template can't be rotated like a password. Watch adoption metrics over narrative.
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, H or QNT?
By tracked market cap: H (Ethereum) measures $157.99M and QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, H or QNT?
On the contract checks we publish: H (Ethereum) grades B and QNT (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have H and QNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show H at −17.9% and QNT at −23.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.