HostHEFE vs BEAM — price, size and safety, side by side
HEFE (Avalanche) vs BEAM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
HEFE vs BEAM — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| HEFE | BEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002235 | $0.003046 |
| Market cap | $1.43M | $133.79M |
| 24h volume | $10.86K DEX | $17.54K DEX |
| Liquidity | $86.50K | $61.76K |
| FDV | $1.43M | $299.20K |
| Holders | 5,399 | 11,104 |
| Age (days) | 910 | 801 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- BEAM measures ~93× the market cap of HEFE
- BEAM measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of HEFE
- BEAM measures ~2.1× the holder count of HEFE
- over the shared window HEFE moved −30.6% while BEAM moved +20.7%
What the data says
HEFE
Where a lot of tokens leave a door open, HEFE has closed both. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HEFE earns a B (78/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HEFE shows a $86.50K pool, a holder base of 5,399 and 910 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.43M in market cap, the $86.50K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,399-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
BEAM
One detail on BEAM didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Here's where BEAM stands today: a $61.76K pool, a holder base of 11,104 and an established record at 801 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $133.79M, that $61.76K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. The 11,104-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of BEAM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HEFE or BEAM?
By tracked market cap: HEFE (Avalanche) measures $1.43M and BEAM (Avalanche) measures $133.79M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HEFE or BEAM?
On the contract checks we publish: HEFE (Avalanche) grades B and BEAM (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HEFE and BEAM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show HEFE at −30.6% and BEAM at +20.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.