HostHUMA vs TRIPLET — price, size and safety, side by side
HUMA (BNB Chain) vs TRIPLET (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
HUMA vs TRIPLET — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| HUMA | TRIPLET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02741 | $0.005918 |
| Market cap | $55.57M | $8.94M |
| 24h volume | $2.83M DEX | $1.14M DEX |
| Liquidity | $703.26K | $429.65K |
| FDV | $14.64M | $8.94M |
| Holders | 4,721 | 22,749 |
| Age (days) | 501 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- HUMA measures ~6.2× the market cap of TRIPLET
- HUMA measures ~1.6× the liquidity of TRIPLET
- HUMA measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of TRIPLET
- TRIPLET measures ~4.8× the holder count of HUMA
- over the shared window HUMA moved −10.4% while TRIPLET moved −16.6%
What the data says
HUMA
There's a lot to like about how HUMA's contract is set up. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HUMA earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HUMA shows $703.26K of on-chain liquidity, 4,721 wallets holding and an established 501-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $703.26K of depth beside roughly $55.57M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 4,721 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
TRIPLET
TRIPLET — Tung Tung Tung Sahur — is a Solana meme built on the Italian-brainrot character wave, one of the few from that meta to hold a real market. The mint J8PSdNP3QewKq2Z1JJJFDMaqF7KcaiJhR7gbr5KZpump is what our scan tracks: $8.9 million market cap, $430 thousand of liquidity and 22,749 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest meme frame with a durability note: brainrot memes burned hot and fast, and most of the cohort is already dead — the ones still standing with real pools are the survivors the community kept. That is evidence of an active holder base, not of value; twenty-two thousand holders and a nearly-four-hundred-thousand-dollar pool is a real market by meme standards.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HUMA or TRIPLET?
By tracked market cap: HUMA (BNB Chain) measures $55.57M and TRIPLET (Solana) measures $8.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HUMA or TRIPLET?
On the contract checks we publish: HUMA (BNB Chain) grades A and TRIPLET (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HUMA and TRIPLET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show HUMA at −10.4% and TRIPLET at −16.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.