HostIBGT vs IR — price, size and safety, side by side
IBGT (Berachain) vs IR (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
IBGT vs IR — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| IBGT | IR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1871 | $0.003779 |
| Market cap | $567.09K | $813.64K |
| 24h volume | $90.50 DEX | $478.62 DEX |
| Liquidity | $38.00K | $31.14K |
| FDV | $567.09K | $3.97M |
| Holders | 25,840 | 6,538 |
| Age (days) | 588 | 323 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- IR measures ~5.3× the 24h volume of IBGT
- IBGT measures ~4.0× the holder count of IR
- over the shared window IBGT moved −14.5% while IR moved −5.24%
What the data says
IBGT
The most important thing to know about IBGT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the market side, IBGT brings a $38.00K pool, 25,840 wallets holding and an established 588-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $567.09K in market cap, the $38.00K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 25,840-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created IBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
IR
The contract behind IR is about as reassuring as they come. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. That leaves IR at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On the market side, IR brings $31.14K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 6,538 and a maturing record at 323 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $31.14K of depth beside roughly $813.64K in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 6,538 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBGT or IR?
By tracked market cap: IBGT (Berachain) measures $567.09K and IR (Berachain) measures $813.64K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBGT or IR?
On the contract checks we publish: IBGT (Berachain) grades C and IR (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBGT and IR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show IBGT at −14.5% and IR at −5.24%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.