HostIBGT vs POLLEN — price, size and safety, side by side
IBGT (Berachain) vs POLLEN (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
IBGT vs POLLEN — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| IBGT | POLLEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1871 | $0.0001645 |
| Market cap | $567.09K | $70.25K |
| 24h volume | $90.50 DEX | $25.72 DEX |
| Liquidity | $38.00K | $11.83K |
| FDV | $567.09K | $119.57K |
| Holders | 25,840 | 17,499 |
| Age (days) | 588 | 558 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- IBGT measures ~8.1× the market cap of POLLEN
- IBGT measures ~3.2× the liquidity of POLLEN
- IBGT measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of POLLEN
- over the shared window IBGT moved −14.5% while POLLEN moved −45.4%
What the data says
IBGT
The most important thing to know about IBGT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the market side, IBGT brings a $38.00K pool, 25,840 wallets holding and an established 588-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $567.09K in market cap, the $38.00K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 25,840-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created IBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBGT or POLLEN?
By tracked market cap: IBGT (Berachain) measures $567.09K and POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBGT or POLLEN?
On the contract checks we publish: IBGT (Berachain) grades C and POLLEN (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBGT and POLLEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show IBGT at −14.5% and POLLEN at −45.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.