HostIDL vs GMT — price, size and safety, side by side
IDL (Polygon) vs GMT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
IDL vs GMT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| IDL | GMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2469 | $0.007546 |
| Market cap | — | $25.94M |
| 24h volume | $28.06K DEX | $30.20K DEX |
| Liquidity | $711.28K | $621.92K |
| FDV | $5.65M | $16.23M |
| Holders | 19,811 | 46,298 |
| Age (days) | 327 | 963 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GMT measures ~2.3× the holder count of IDL
- over the shared window IDL moved −29.5% while GMT moved −9.48%
What the data says
IDL
IDL — InfinityDAO — is a 312-day-old Polygon token at 0x4c18406fa690faa53e5efa899a971557251af72d, priced at a $5.7 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The venue read is the strong side: $711.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is healthy against the cap — a book deep enough that normal hands can enter and leave without moving the mark hard. The unmeasured side is the caveat: contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, and holder distribution was not resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The October 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IDL or GMT?
By tracked market cap: IDL (Polygon) measures — and GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IDL or GMT?
On the contract checks we publish: IDL (Polygon) grades B and GMT (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IDL and GMT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show IDL at −29.5% and GMT at −9.48%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.