HostINST vs CES — price, size and safety, side by side
INST (Polygon) vs CES (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
INST vs CES — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| INST | CES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.30 | $0.2042 |
| Market cap | $166.93M | — |
| 24h volume | $155.67K DEX | $308.07K DEX |
| Liquidity | $634.32K | $465.31K |
| FDV | $1.07M | $86.89M |
| Holders | 4,511 | — |
| Age (days) | 1,702 | 512 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CES measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of INST
- over the shared window INST moved +15.3% while CES moved −17.0%
What the data says
INST
There's a small gap on this page — INST's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, INST shows $634.32K of on-chain liquidity, 4,511 wallets holding and 1,702 days old as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $634.32K of depth against a market cap of about $166.93M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: INST reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 4,511-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
CES
CES at 0x1bdf71ede1a4777db1eebe7232bcda20d6fc1610 — listed as WhaleBit — is the utility token of the Meta Whale ecosystem on Polygon, 494 days into its record at the September 21, 2026 snapshot. The snapshot prices no market cap on the row; what it measures instead is $601.6 thousand of tracked pool depth, $445.2 thousand of 24-hour volume and 293,912 holders — a very wide holder count for a token this size, the signature of an ecosystem distributing units to its own members.
The deploy is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment — and the ten largest wallets hold 84.1% of the 422.1 million supply. Both are shapes to weigh on an ecosystem token: upgradeability is how a managed project stays maintained, and heavy top concentration is how ecosystem treasuries typically look — the same flag also describes insider-heavy books.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INST or CES?
By tracked market cap: INST (Polygon) measures $166.93M and CES (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INST or CES?
On the contract checks we publish: INST (Polygon) grades B and CES (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INST and CES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show INST at +15.3% and CES at −17.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.