HostINST vs GMT — price, size and safety, side by side
INST (Polygon) vs GMT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
INST vs GMT — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| INST | GMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.30 | $0.007546 |
| Market cap | $166.93M | $25.94M |
| 24h volume | $155.67K DEX | $30.20K DEX |
| Liquidity | $634.32K | $621.92K |
| FDV | $1.07M | $16.23M |
| Holders | 4,511 | 46,298 |
| Age (days) | 1,702 | 963 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- INST measures ~6.4× the market cap of GMT
- INST measures ~5.2× the 24h volume of GMT
- GMT measures ~10× the holder count of INST
- over the shared window INST moved +15.3% while GMT moved −13.7%
What the data says
INST
There's a small gap on this page — INST's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, INST shows $634.32K of on-chain liquidity, 4,511 wallets holding and 1,702 days old as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $634.32K of depth against a market cap of about $166.93M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: INST reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 4,511-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The October 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INST or GMT?
By tracked market cap: INST (Polygon) measures $166.93M and GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INST or GMT?
On the contract checks we publish: INST (Polygon) grades B and GMT (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INST and GMT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show INST at +15.3% and GMT at −13.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.