HostIR vs POLLEN — price, size and safety, side by side
IR (Berachain) vs POLLEN (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
IR vs POLLEN — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| IR | POLLEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003779 | $0.0001645 |
| Market cap | $813.64K | $70.25K |
| 24h volume | $478.62 DEX | $25.72 DEX |
| Liquidity | $31.14K | $11.83K |
| FDV | $3.97M | $119.57K |
| Holders | 6,538 | 17,499 |
| Age (days) | 323 | 558 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- IR measures ~12× the market cap of POLLEN
- IR measures ~2.6× the liquidity of POLLEN
- IR measures ~19× the 24h volume of POLLEN
- POLLEN measures ~2.7× the holder count of IR
- over the shared window IR moved −5.24% while POLLEN moved −45.4%
What the data says
IR
The contract behind IR is about as reassuring as they come. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. That leaves IR at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On the market side, IR brings $31.14K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 6,538 and a maturing record at 323 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $31.14K of depth beside roughly $813.64K in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 6,538 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
POLLEN
The contract behind POLLEN is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason POLLEN's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, POLLEN carries $11.83K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 17,499 and an established 558-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $11.83K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $70.25K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 17,499 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created POLLEN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IR or POLLEN?
By tracked market cap: IR (Berachain) measures $813.64K and POLLEN (Berachain) measures $70.25K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IR or POLLEN?
On the contract checks we publish: IR (Berachain) grades A and POLLEN (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IR and POLLEN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show IR at −5.24% and POLLEN at −45.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.