HostJLUSDC vs JSOL — price, size and safety, side by side
JLUSDC (Solana) vs JSOL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
JLUSDC vs JSOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| JLUSDC | JSOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.06 | $143.80 |
| Market cap | $458.81M | $152.70M |
| 24h volume | $19.92M DEX | $20.13K DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $458.81M | $152.70M |
| Holders | 13,503 | 3,657 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JLUSDC measures ~3.0× the market cap of JSOL
- JLUSDC measures ~990× the 24h volume of JSOL
- JLUSDC measures ~3.7× the holder count of JSOL
What the data says
JLUSDC
jlUSDC is the odd one out among this site's yield tokens: it isn't staked SOL at all. Deposit USDC into Jupiter Lend and you receive jlUSDC — mint 9BEcn9aPEmhSPbPQeFGjidRiEKki46fVQDyPpSQXPA2D — a receipt that appreciates as borrowers pay interest on the pooled dollars. The October 6, 2026 snapshot records roughly $458.8 million of deposits represented across 13,503 holders, which makes it one of the larger dollar-yield venues on Solana.
Reading a lending receipt correctly means stacking its layers. Layer one is USDC itself, with everything that implies — Circle's reserves, its compliance freeze powers, the fiat-backed model (our USDC guide covers that story). Layer two is the lending market: your yield exists because someone borrowed the pool's dollars against collateral, so the risks that matter are utilization crunches (in a panic, if the pool is heavily lent out, withdrawals queue until loans repay or liquidate) and bad debt (collateral crashing faster than liquidations can clear it). Layer three is the protocol's contract surface itself. None of these showed distress in this snapshot; all of them are the price of the yield.
JSOL
JSOL comes from the generation of Solana stake pools that predates the branding wars. JPool launched its pool token back when liquid staking on Solana was a niche pursuit rather than a product category, and it has simply kept running: the mint at 7Q2afV64in6N6SeZsAAB81TJzwDoD6zpqmHkzi9Dcavn represents roughly $152.7 million of stake across 3,657 holders in HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot. In a field where longevity is the scarcest credential, several years of uneventful operation is JPool's quiet pitch.
The class mechanics hold: freeze authority revoked, so no holder can be locked; supply minted on stake and burned on unstake by the pool program — the design's engine, not a discretionary lever; value appreciating against SOL as validator rewards accrue across JPool's delegation set. One figure worth a glance rather than alarm: the deployer-associated share reads 0.038%, higher than the zero most peers show but still a couple of orders of magnitude below anything that could steer a market.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JLUSDC or JSOL?
By tracked market cap: JLUSDC (Solana) measures $458.81M and JSOL (Solana) measures $152.70M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JLUSDC or JSOL?
On the contract checks we publish: JLUSDC (Solana) grades A and JSOL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JLUSDC and JSOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show JLUSDC at +0.52% and JSOL at +2.04%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.