HostJUICE vs BLAST — price, size and safety, side by side
JUICE (Blast) vs BLAST (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
JUICE vs BLAST — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| JUICE | BLAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001501 | $0.00002155 |
| Market cap | $15.12K | $2.64M |
| 24h volume | $39.56 DEX | $4.12K DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.76K | $4.52K |
| FDV | $15.33K | $3.72M |
| Holders | 74,602 | 279,524 |
| Age (days) | 927 | 836 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- BLAST measures ~174× the market cap of JUICE
- JUICE measures ~1.7× the liquidity of BLAST
- BLAST measures ~104× the 24h volume of JUICE
- BLAST measures ~3.7× the holder count of JUICE
- over the shared window JUICE moved −2.16% while BLAST moved −42.0%
What the data says
JUICE
The contract behind JUICE is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's why JUICE sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Market-wise, JUICE carries $7.76K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 74,602 and an established 927-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $7.76K pool stands up well to a ~$15.12K cap — depth like that means JUICE absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 74,602 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of JUICE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
BLAST
One thing stands out on BLAST, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why BLAST is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, BLAST carries a $4.52K pool, 279,524 wallets holding and an established record at 836 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $4.52K pool against a ~$2.64M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so BLAST's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A holder base of 279,524 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JUICE or BLAST?
By tracked market cap: JUICE (Blast) measures $15.12K and BLAST (Blast) measures $2.64M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JUICE or BLAST?
On the contract checks we publish: JUICE (Blast) grades A and BLAST (Blast) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JUICE and BLAST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show JUICE at −2.16% and BLAST at −42.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.