HostJUICE vs PAC — price, size and safety, side by side
JUICE (Blast) vs PAC (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
JUICE vs PAC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| JUICE | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00001501 | $0.0001167 |
| Market cap | $15.12K | $120.93K |
| 24h volume | $39.56 DEX | $286.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.76K | $1.57K |
| FDV | $15.33K | $9.45K |
| Holders | 74,602 | 97,780 |
| Age (days) | 927 | 939 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PAC measures ~8.0× the market cap of JUICE
- JUICE measures ~4.9× the liquidity of PAC
- PAC measures ~7.2× the 24h volume of JUICE
What the data says
JUICE
The contract behind JUICE is about as reassuring as they come. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's why JUICE sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Market-wise, JUICE carries $7.76K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 74,602 and an established 927-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $7.76K pool stands up well to a ~$15.12K cap — depth like that means JUICE absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 74,602 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of JUICE as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
PAC
Right at the foundation, PAC does both of the things you'd hope to see. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. That's why PAC sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
On liquidity and holders, PAC shows workable liquidity of $1.57K, a holder base of 97,780 and 939 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $120.93K, the $1.57K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 97,780-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JUICE or PAC?
By tracked market cap: JUICE (Blast) measures $15.12K and PAC (Blast) measures $120.93K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JUICE or PAC?
On the contract checks we publish: JUICE (Blast) grades A and PAC (Blast) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JUICE and PAC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show JUICE at −2.16% and PAC at −5.91%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.