HostLBGT vs EWBERA-4 — price, size and safety, side by side
LBGT (Berachain) vs EWBERA-4 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
LBGT vs EWBERA-4 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| LBGT | EWBERA-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1906 | $0.3062 |
| Market cap | $34.86K | — |
| 24h volume | $1.41K DEX | $5.57K DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.10K | $1.42K |
| FDV | $34.86K | $445.89K |
| Holders | 16,141 | 7,799 |
| Age (days) | 591 | 508 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- LBGT measures ~4.3× the liquidity of EWBERA-4
- EWBERA-4 measures ~3.9× the 24h volume of LBGT
- LBGT measures ~2.1× the holder count of EWBERA-4
- over the shared window LBGT moved +13.1% while EWBERA-4 moved −11.8%
What the data says
LBGT
The most important thing to know about LBGT is its authority setup. Right now LBGT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LBGT is at D (40/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, LBGT brings deep liquidity of $6.10K, 16,141 wallets holding and an established record at 591 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $6.10K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $34.86K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 16,141-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
EWBERA-4
There's a small gap on this page — EWBERA-4's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, EWBERA-4 carries a $1.42K pool, 7,799 wallets holding and 508 days old as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $1.42K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 7,799-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBGT or EWBERA-4?
By tracked market cap: LBGT (Berachain) measures $34.86K and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBGT or EWBERA-4?
On the contract checks we publish: LBGT (Berachain) grades D and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBGT and EWBERA-4 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show LBGT at +13.1% and EWBERA-4 at −11.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.