HostLBGT vs YEET — price, size and safety, side by side
LBGT (Berachain) vs YEET (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
LBGT vs YEET — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| LBGT | YEET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1855 | $0.0000305 |
| Market cap | $34.86K | $27.65K |
| 24h volume | $1.41K DEX | $35.56 DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.10K | $4.54K |
| FDV | $34.86K | $33.13K |
| Holders | 16,141 | 20,240 |
| Age (days) | 591 | 606 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- LBGT measures ~40× the 24h volume of YEET
- over the shared window LBGT moved +10.1% while YEET moved −22.7%
What the data says
LBGT
The most important thing to know about LBGT is its authority setup. Right now LBGT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LBGT is at D (40/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, LBGT brings deep liquidity of $6.10K, 16,141 wallets holding and an established record at 591 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $6.10K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $34.86K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. The 16,141-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LBGT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
YEET
YEET's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why YEET earns a A (85/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, YEET brings $4.54K of on-chain liquidity, 20,240 wallets holding and 606 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.54K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $27.65K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 20,240-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created YEET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBGT or YEET?
By tracked market cap: LBGT (Berachain) measures $34.86K and YEET (Berachain) measures $27.65K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBGT or YEET?
On the contract checks we publish: LBGT (Berachain) grades D and YEET (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBGT and YEET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show LBGT at +10.1% and YEET at −22.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.