HostLSK vs GNO — price, size and safety, side by side
LSK (Ethereum) vs GNO (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
LSK vs GNO — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| LSK | GNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1954 | $114.90 |
| Market cap | $103.81M | $305.06M |
| 24h volume | $4.44M DEX | $130.50K DEX |
| Liquidity | $343.21K | $2.54M |
| FDV | $103.81M | $166.99M |
| Holders | 3,618 | 38,619 |
| Age (days) | 483 | 151 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~2.9× the market cap of LSK
- GNO measures ~7.4× the liquidity of LSK
- LSK measures ~34× the 24h volume of GNO
- GNO measures ~11× the holder count of LSK
- over the shared window LSK moved −18.4% while GNO moved −0.58%
What the data says
LSK
LSK is the Lisk token on Ethereum — the asset of one of crypto's oldest sidechain projects, which migrated from its own network to become an EVM L2. The contract 0x6033f7f88332b8db6ad452b7c6d5bb643990ae3f is what our scan tracks: $343 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest frame for a veteran migration: Lisk is a survivor — nearly a decade old — but survivorship is not momentum. The token's case depends on its L2 winning real usage in a crowded field where it competes with much larger ecosystems, and the pool depth on Ethereum reflects a legacy holder base more than an active market.
GNO
One detail on GNO didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, GNO shows a $2.54M pool, 38,619 wallets holding and a maturing record at 151 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $2.54M pool against a ~$305.06M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so GNO's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. 38,619 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LSK or GNO?
By tracked market cap: LSK (Ethereum) measures $103.81M and GNO (Gnosis) measures $305.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LSK or GNO?
On the contract checks we publish: LSK (Ethereum) grades A and GNO (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LSK and GNO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show LSK at −18.4% and GNO at −0.58%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.