HostLYN vs BTG — price, size and safety, side by side
LYN (BNB Chain) vs BTG (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
LYN vs BTG — normalized performance, 2026-10-11 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| LYN | BTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01439 | $0.7423 |
| Market cap | $4.51M | $1.75M |
| 24h volume | $2.09M DEX | $2.38M DEX |
| Liquidity | $79.21K | $65.16K |
| FDV | $21.60M | $18.43M |
| Holders | 21,970 | 64,175 |
| Age (days) | 365 | 374 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- LYN measures ~2.6× the market cap of BTG
- BTG measures ~2.9× the holder count of LYN
- over the shared window LYN moved −12.8% while BTG moved −19.4%
What the data says
LYN
LYN has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. The mint function on LYN's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LYN is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, LYN shows workable liquidity of $79.21K, 21,970 holders and an established record at 365 days as of 2026-10-09. The $79.21K pool against a ~$4.51M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 21,970 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LYN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
BTG
Start with the good news — BTG's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason BTG's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On liquidity and holders, BTG shows $65.16K of on-chain liquidity, 64,175 wallets holding and an established record at 374 days as of 2026-10-09. The $65.16K pool against a ~$1.75M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The 64,175-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LYN or BTG?
By tracked market cap: LYN (BNB Chain) measures $4.51M and BTG (BNB Chain) measures $1.75M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LYN or BTG?
On the contract checks we publish: LYN (BNB Chain) grades C and BTG (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LYN and BTG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-11 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show LYN at −12.8% and BTG at −19.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-11→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.