HostMEBT vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.
MEBT vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| MEBT | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.62 | $0.3421 |
| Market cap | — | $559.04M |
| 24h volume | $87.41K DEX | $948.47K DEX |
| Liquidity | $261.64K | $9.96M |
| FDV | $4.44M | $861.85M |
| Holders | 7,115 | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | 126 | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~38× the liquidity of MEBT
- CRV measures ~11× the 24h volume of MEBT
- CRV measures ~14× the holder count of MEBT
- over the shared window MEBT moved −15.2% while CRV moved −0.18%
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot — with 7,115 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $261.6 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $559.0 million market cap against an $861.8 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $10.0 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or CRV?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures — and CRV (Ethereum) measures $559.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show MEBT at −15.2% and CRV at −0.18%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.