HostMIM vs HEFE — price, size and safety, side by side
MIM (Avalanche) vs HEFE (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
MIM vs HEFE — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| MIM | HEFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04462 | $0.002232 |
| Market cap | $278.39K | $1.43M |
| 24h volume | $4.43K DEX | $10.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $107.89K | $86.50K |
| FDV | $278.39K | $1.43M |
| Holders | 99,979 | 5,399 |
| Age (days) | 1,835 | 910 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- HEFE measures ~5.1× the market cap of MIM
- HEFE measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of MIM
- MIM measures ~19× the holder count of HEFE
- over the shared window MIM moved +34.4% while HEFE moved −30.7%
What the data says
MIM
MIM — Magic Internet Money — is Abracadabra’s collateral-backed stablecoin, the asset that rode the 2021 leverage wave and has been shrinking toward the noise floor since. The Avalanche deployment at 0x130966628846bfd36ff31a822705796e8cb8c18d is one of the many chain homes left from the era when it went everywhere.
Our October 6, 2026 snapshot tells the story in numbers: a $278.4 thousand market cap ($278.4 thousand fully-diluted on the 7.4 million tokens here), 99,979 holders still carrying the remainder, $107.9 thousand of pool liquidity that reads deep only because the market cap fell to meet it, and $46.1 thousand traded in the last day. The token is 1,820 days old.
HEFE
Where a lot of tokens leave a door open, HEFE has closed both. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HEFE earns a B (78/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HEFE shows a $86.50K pool, a holder base of 5,399 and 910 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.43M in market cap, the $86.50K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,399-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MIM or HEFE?
By tracked market cap: MIM (Avalanche) measures $278.39K and HEFE (Avalanche) measures $1.43M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MIM or HEFE?
On the contract checks we publish: MIM (Avalanche) grades D and HEFE (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MIM and HEFE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show MIM at +34.4% and HEFE at −30.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.