HostMNT vs SCS — price, size and safety, side by side
MNT (Solana) vs SCS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
MNT vs SCS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| MNT | SCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5349 | $0.001659 |
| Market cap | $3.19M | $5.20M |
| 24h volume | $195.53K DEX | $14.34K DEX |
| Liquidity | $295.01K | $293.77K |
| FDV | $3.19M | $5.20M |
| Holders | 701 | 8,295 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SCS measures ~1.6× the market cap of MNT
- MNT measures ~14× the 24h volume of SCS
- SCS measures ~12× the holder count of MNT
- over the shared window MNT moved −14.4% while SCS moved +20.5%
What the data says
MNT
Mantle's MNT on Solana — the bridged claim on the governance/gas token of the Mantle Ethereum L2 — at mint 4SoQ8UkWfeDH47T56PA53CZCeW4KytYCiU65CwBWoJUt. The October 6, 2026 snapshot shows about $295 thousand of liquidity and roughly 701 holders.
MNT the asset is a real mid-cap L2 token — Mantle runs one of the larger Ethereum rollups, born from the BitDAO treasury, with the token doing gas and governance duty. The Solana version is a bridge claim; the canonical asset is ERC-20 and its real markets are on Mantle/Ethereum/CEXs.
SCS
SCS is the token of Solcasino — a crypto casino operating on Solana, one of the longer-running gambling venues on the chain. The mint SCSuPPNUSypLBsV4darsrYNg4ANPgaGhKhsA3GmMyjz is what our scan tracks: $5.2 million market cap, $294 thousand of liquidity and 8,295 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest frame for casino tokens: the value case is the venue's rake — a real revenue stream, unlike most of the corpus — countered by the regulatory and reputational posture gambling carries everywhere it operates. A casino token is also a claim on the operator staying solvent and honest, two things the chain cannot verify for you. Liquidity here is functional for the cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNT or SCS?
By tracked market cap: MNT (Solana) measures $3.19M and SCS (Solana) measures $5.20M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNT or SCS?
On the contract checks we publish: MNT (Solana) grades A and SCS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNT and SCS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show MNT at −14.4% and SCS at +20.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.