HostMRVLX vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
MRVLX (Solana) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
MRVLX vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| MRVLX | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $227.17 | $0.01763 |
| Market cap | $46.94M | $11.67M |
| 24h volume | — | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.01K | $301.30K |
| FDV | $46.94M | $124.98M |
| Holders | 381 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | — | 140 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- MRVLX measures ~4.0× the market cap of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~100× the liquidity of MRVLX
- PLAY measures ~17× the holder count of MRVLX
- over the shared window MRVLX moved −6.05% while PLAY moved −43.5%
What the data says
MRVLX
MRVLX is the xStock for Marvell Technology — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper for a data-center semiconductor name. The mint XsuxRGDzbLjnJ72v74b7p9VY6N66uYgTCyfwwRjVCJA is what our scan tracks: $46.9 million market cap on $3.0 thousand of liquidity and 381 holders as of October 6, 2026.
Those figures describe a cap with almost no door: under two thousand dollars of pool liquidity underneath a roughly forty-million-dollar token supply. Treat the printed cap as arithmetic, not a valuation you could realize — and note the holder count is the smallest in the xStock line. The wrapper mechanics are Backed-standard; the liquidity posture is the outlier and is why our scan grades it C.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MRVLX or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: MRVLX (Solana) measures $46.94M and PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MRVLX or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: MRVLX (Solana) grades C and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MRVLX and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show MRVLX at −6.05% and PLAY at −43.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.