HostMU vs SPYX — price, size and safety, side by side
MU (Solana) vs SPYX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
MU vs SPYX — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| MU | SPYX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $881.18 | $761.47 |
| Market cap | $4.07M | $73.66M |
| 24h volume | $3.62M DEX | $19.26M DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.23M | $4.87M |
| FDV | $4.07M | $73.66M |
| Holders | 4,907 | 75,332 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SPYX measures ~18× the market cap of MU
- SPYX measures ~5.3× the 24h volume of MU
- SPYX measures ~15× the holder count of MU
- over the shared window MU moved −14.1% while SPYX moved −1.04%
What the data says
MU
MU is the Micron Technology xStock — a tokenized claim on the US memory-chip maker's equity, part of the Backpack Securities xStocks family that wraps public shares for on-chain trading. The mint MUxEsUKSMACyw5fZf68wxf5FLnZVhtU9CwH8uNNGay1 is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest frame is the shared xStocks one: a claim on custodied shares routed through the wrapper's terms — the equity exposure is real, and so are the 24/7-vs-market-hours gap risk and the wrapper's own counterparty layer. Micron's AI-memory thesis is what the token ultimately tracks; the wrapper is just how it reaches the chain.
SPYX
SPYX is a tokenized S&P 500 — one of Backed Finance's xStocks, designed to track the index ETF's price rather than confer fund shares. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $73.7 million across 75,332 wallets on mint XsoCS1TfEyfFhfvj8EtZ528L3CaKBDBRqRapnBbDF2W.
The trust model is custodial: an xStock's claim on the index runs through the issuer holding the underlying exposure off-chain. You get S&P-shaped returns with Solana settlement — and you accept a regulated counterparty where a native asset has none.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MU or SPYX?
By tracked market cap: MU (Solana) measures $4.07M and SPYX (Solana) measures $73.66M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MU or SPYX?
On the contract checks we publish: MU (Solana) grades A and SPYX (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MU and SPYX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show MU at −14.1% and SPYX at −1.04%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.