HostMUSD vs AXLUSDC — price, size and safety, side by side
MUSD (Monad) vs AXLUSDC (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
MUSD vs AXLUSDC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| MUSD | AXLUSDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.9983 |
| Market cap | $37.66M | — |
| 24h volume | $7.62M DEX | $42.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.74M | $124.62K |
| FDV | $22.12M | $130.38K |
| Holders | 10,151 | 2,524 |
| Age (days) | 144 | 943 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- MUSD measures ~14× the liquidity of AXLUSDC
- MUSD measures ~178× the 24h volume of AXLUSDC
- MUSD measures ~4.0× the holder count of AXLUSDC
What the data says
MUSD
MUSD — MetaMask's USD — is the wallet's own stablecoin: a dollar token aimed at the place its users already live, issued through the M0 infrastructure stack and meant to move between chains as one instrument. The deployment at 0xaca92e438df0b2401ff60da7e4337b687a2435da is on Monad, where our October 9, 2026 snapshot shows $1.7 million of tracked pool liquidity — among the deepest pools we measured on the chain.
What to be honest about: a wallet-issued stablecoin's strength is distribution — every MetaMask user is one tap from it — and its risk is concentration in the issuer's own stack. Backing, redemption and chain-deploy mechanics live with M0 and the contracts behind this address; our snapshot did not assess this deployment's contract-level controls, so the live scan is the place to verify before treating the label as the substance.
AXLUSDC
AXLUSDC has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now AXLUSDC's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, AXLUSDC stays around 47/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where AXLUSDC stands today: $124.62K of on-chain liquidity, 2,524 wallets holding and an established 943-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $124.62K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 2,524 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MUSD or AXLUSDC?
By tracked market cap: MUSD (Monad) measures $37.66M and AXLUSDC (Blast) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MUSD or AXLUSDC?
On the contract checks we publish: MUSD (Monad) grades B and AXLUSDC (Blast) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MUSD and AXLUSDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show MUSD at −0.16% and AXLUSDC at +0.83%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.