Open app

NEAR vs LSK — price, size and safety, side by side

NEAR (Ethereum) vs LSK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.

NEARB

$5.16
NEAR on Ethereum
Trade NEAR
vs

LSKA

$0.2011
Lisk on Ethereum
Trade LSK

NEAR vs LSK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32

100 — shared start
NEAR +22.9%  ·  LSK −53.2% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
NEARLSK
Price$5.16$0.2011
Market cap$15.74M$103.81M
24h volume$995.23K DEX$4.44M DEX
Liquidity$420.92K$343.21K
FDV$15.78M$103.81M
Holders14,5523,618
Age (days)904483
Safety gradeBA

Where they differ

What the data says

NEAR

NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.

The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

LSK

LSK is the Lisk token on Ethereum — the asset of one of crypto's oldest sidechain projects, which migrated from its own network to become an EVM L2. The contract 0x6033f7f88332b8db6ad452b7c6d5bb643990ae3f is what our scan tracks: $343 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.

The honest frame for a veteran migration: Lisk is a survivor — nearly a decade old — but survivorship is not momentum. The token's case depends on its L2 winning real usage in a crowded field where it competes with much larger ecosystems, and the pool depth on Ethereum reflects a legacy holder base more than an active market.

FAQ

Which is bigger, NEAR or LSK?

By tracked market cap: NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M and LSK (Ethereum) measures $103.81M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, NEAR or LSK?

On the contract checks we publish: NEAR (Ethereum) grades B and LSK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have NEAR and LSK performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show NEAR at +22.9% and LSK at −53.2%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.