HostNECT vs IBERA — price, size and safety, side by side
NECT (Berachain) vs IBERA (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
NECT vs IBERA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| NECT | IBERA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9985 | $0.1959 |
| Market cap | $4.44M | $17.52M |
| 24h volume | $16.86K DEX | $3.02K DEX |
| Liquidity | $55.68K | $42.63K |
| FDV | $267.23K | $17.52M |
| Holders | 14,704 | 35,930 |
| Age (days) | 358 | 607 |
| Safety grade | E | B |
Where they differ
- IBERA measures ~4.0× the market cap of NECT
- NECT measures ~5.6× the 24h volume of IBERA
- IBERA measures ~2.4× the holder count of NECT
- over the shared window NECT moved +6.25% while IBERA moved −11.4%
What the data says
NECT
The most important thing to know about NECT is its authority setup. Right now NECT's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 21/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, NECT carries workable liquidity of $55.68K, 14,704 holders and a maturing record at 358 days as of 2026-10-09. The $55.68K pool against a ~$4.44M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 14,704 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of NECT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
IBERA
There's a small gap on this page — IBERA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, IBERA shows a $42.63K pool, a holder base of 35,930 and an established record at 607 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $42.63K of depth against a market cap of about $17.52M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IBERA reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 35,930 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NECT or IBERA?
By tracked market cap: NECT (Berachain) measures $4.44M and IBERA (Berachain) measures $17.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NECT or IBERA?
On the contract checks we publish: NECT (Berachain) grades E and IBERA (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NECT and IBERA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show NECT at +6.25% and IBERA at −11.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.