HostNECT vs SWBERA — price, size and safety, side by side
NECT (Berachain) vs SWBERA (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
NECT vs SWBERA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| NECT | SWBERA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9985 | $0.2733 |
| Market cap | $4.44M | $11.38M |
| 24h volume | $16.86K DEX | $155.53K DEX |
| Liquidity | $55.68K | $24.04K |
| FDV | $267.23K | $11.34M |
| Holders | 14,704 | 13,011 |
| Age (days) | 358 | 442 |
| Safety grade | E | B |
Where they differ
- SWBERA measures ~2.6× the market cap of NECT
- NECT measures ~2.3× the liquidity of SWBERA
- SWBERA measures ~9.2× the 24h volume of NECT
- over the shared window NECT moved +6.25% while SWBERA moved −9.91%
What the data says
NECT
The most important thing to know about NECT is its authority setup. Right now NECT's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 21/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, NECT carries workable liquidity of $55.68K, 14,704 holders and a maturing record at 358 days as of 2026-10-09. The $55.68K pool against a ~$4.44M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 14,704 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of NECT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
SWBERA
One detail on SWBERA didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SWBERA shows $24.04K of on-chain liquidity, 13,011 wallets holding and an established record at 442 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $24.04K pool against roughly $11.38M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 13,011-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SWBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NECT or SWBERA?
By tracked market cap: NECT (Berachain) measures $4.44M and SWBERA (Berachain) measures $11.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NECT or SWBERA?
On the contract checks we publish: NECT (Berachain) grades E and SWBERA (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NECT and SWBERA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show NECT at +6.25% and SWBERA at −9.91%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.