HostNES vs CLAUS — price, size and safety, side by side
NES (Ethereum) vs CLAUS (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
NES vs CLAUS — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| NES | CLAUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0003344 | $0.003486 |
| Market cap | $75.57K | — |
| 24h volume | $71.64 DEX | $7.65M DEX |
| Liquidity | $264.43K | $205.84K |
| FDV | $111.63K | $9.78M |
| Holders | 28,890 | 2,286 |
| Age (days) | 50 | 5 |
| Safety grade | B | E |
Where they differ
- CLAUS measures ~106,766× the 24h volume of NES
- NES measures ~13× the holder count of CLAUS
- over the shared window NES moved −46.7% while CLAUS moved −79.8%
What the data says
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our October 6, 2026 read shows $264 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
CLAUS
CLAUS has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. As of 2026-10-09, CLAUS's contract still holds a pause or blacklist lever, leaving the deployer able to freeze or block token transfers for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CLAUS is at E (34/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, CLAUS shows workable liquidity of $205.84K, a holder base of 2,286 and a brand-new 5-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $205.84K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 2,286 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NES or CLAUS?
By tracked market cap: NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K and CLAUS (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NES or CLAUS?
On the contract checks we publish: NES (Ethereum) grades B and CLAUS (Ethereum) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NES and CLAUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show NES at −46.7% and CLAUS at −79.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.