HostNXPC vs BEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
NXPC (Avalanche) vs BEAR (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
NXPC vs BEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| NXPC | BEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1748 | $0.00000003501 |
| Market cap | $33.84M | — |
| 24h volume | $6.29K DEX | $0.00 DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.37K | $4.81K |
| FDV | $30.62M | $16.17K |
| Holders | 54,414 | 5,263 |
| Age (days) | 509 | 1,018 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- NXPC measures ~1.5× the liquidity of BEAR
- NXPC measures ~10× the holder count of BEAR
- over the shared window NXPC moved −32.1% while BEAR moved −51.5%
What the data says
NXPC
NXPC is the token tied to Nexpace, the Web3 arm of the MapleStory franchise — the Avalanche deployment at 0x5e0e90e268bc247cc850c789a0db0d5c7621fb59 prices a $33.8 million market cap across 54,414 wallets on the October 6, 2026 snapshot, 494 days into the token's life.
The contract read is the most dangerous in this batch: the owner can rewrite balances outright — the flag that turns every other number cosmetic — alongside live mint and pause levers, while the top ten wallets hold about 89.2% of the supply. The tracked book of $7.4 thousand against a $33M cap is not a market; it is a vestige.
BEAR
BEAR is a 1,018-day-old Avalanche token at 0x19c79f282d151995d91f6dbdda2739701f9c47aa — nearly three years in — priced at a $16.2 thousand fully diluted valuation across 5,263 wallets on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The book has collapsed to a vestige: $4.8 thousand of tracked liquidity against a $16.2 thousand valuation, and the contract kept one live lever — it can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 51.1%, meaning even a five-figure valuation is half-held by ten addresses. The grade is C at 60 — the snapshot's honest sum of thin venue, live mint, and concentrated float.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NXPC or BEAR?
By tracked market cap: NXPC (Avalanche) measures $33.84M and BEAR (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NXPC or BEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: NXPC (Avalanche) grades E and BEAR (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NXPC and BEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show NXPC at −32.1% and BEAR at −51.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.