HostOLAS vs COW — price, size and safety, side by side
OLAS (Gnosis) vs COW (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
OLAS vs COW — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| OLAS | COW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0518 | $0.1329 |
| Market cap | $13.31M | $82.07M |
| 24h volume | $1.40K DEX | $7.47K DEX |
| Liquidity | $181.84K | $142.24K |
| FDV | $600.37K | $2.61M |
| Holders | 2,373 | 12,011 |
| Age (days) | 1,094 | 224 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- COW measures ~6.2× the market cap of OLAS
- COW measures ~5.3× the 24h volume of OLAS
- COW measures ~5.1× the holder count of OLAS
- over the shared window OLAS moved +16.6% while COW moved −6.97%
What the data says
OLAS
There's a small gap on this page — OLAS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On liquidity and holders, OLAS shows a $181.84K pool, 2,373 holders and an established 1,094-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $13.31M, the $181.84K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 2,373-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OLAS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
COW
One detail on COW didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, COW is showing a $142.24K pool, a holder base of 12,011 and a maturing 224-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $142.24K of depth against a market cap of about $82.07M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: COW reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 12,011-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of COW as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OLAS or COW?
By tracked market cap: OLAS (Gnosis) measures $13.31M and COW (Gnosis) measures $82.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OLAS or COW?
On the contract checks we publish: OLAS (Gnosis) grades B and COW (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OLAS and COW performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show OLAS at +16.6% and COW at −6.97%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.