HostOPENAI vs SWARMS — price, size and safety, side by side
OPENAI (Base) vs SWARMS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-02 / 2026-10-17.
OPENAI vs SWARMS — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-02
| OPENAI | SWARMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000009391 | $0.007251 |
| Market cap | $2.55M | $8.47M |
| 24h volume | $24.07M DEX | $201.18K DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.03M | $819.41K |
| FDV | $2.55M | $8.47M |
| Holders | 5,065 | 28,874 |
| Age (days) | 0 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SWARMS measures ~3.3× the market cap of OPENAI
- OPENAI measures ~11× the liquidity of SWARMS
- OPENAI measures ~120× the 24h volume of SWARMS
- SWARMS measures ~5.7× the holder count of OPENAI
- over the shared window OPENAI moved −98.1% while SWARMS moved −7.52%
What the data says
OPENAI
OPENAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (90/100, 2026-10-09).
On the trading data, OPENAI shows deep liquidity of $9.03M, 5,065 wallets holding and a brand-new 0-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $2.55M in market cap, the $9.03M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 5,065-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OPENAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SWARMS
SWARMS is a Solana AI-agent token — themed on multi-agent frameworks, one of the larger survivors of the agent-token wave. The mint 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump is what our scan tracks: $8.5 million market cap, $819 thousand of liquidity and 28,874 holders as of October 6, 2026 — a genuinely deep pool and a very wide holder base for this cap.
The honest caution is the category's: agent-framework tokens are narrative instruments first — the holders are real, the market is real, and the technology they gesture at is real somewhere, but the value linkage between an open framework and its token is loose at best. What the figures do support is that this market is functional, which the long tail of agent tokens cannot claim.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OPENAI or SWARMS?
By tracked market cap: OPENAI (Base) measures $2.55M and SWARMS (Solana) measures $8.47M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OPENAI or SWARMS?
On the contract checks we publish: OPENAI (Base) grades A and SWARMS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OPENAI and SWARMS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-02, the measured snapshots show OPENAI at −98.1% and SWARMS at −7.52%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.