HostORBIT vs BLAST — price, size and safety, side by side
ORBIT (Blast) vs BLAST (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
ORBIT vs BLAST — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| ORBIT | BLAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004105 | $0.00001971 |
| Market cap | $26.55K | $2.64M |
| 24h volume | $206.52 DEX | $4.12K DEX |
| Liquidity | $11.74K | $4.52K |
| FDV | $43.31K | $3.72M |
| Holders | 47,389 | 279,524 |
| Age (days) | 952 | 836 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- BLAST measures ~99× the market cap of ORBIT
- ORBIT measures ~2.6× the liquidity of BLAST
- BLAST measures ~20× the 24h volume of ORBIT
- BLAST measures ~5.9× the holder count of ORBIT
- over the shared window ORBIT moved −7.35% while BLAST moved −46.9%
What the data says
ORBIT
ORBIT's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. That leaves ORBIT at a healthy 85/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Here's where ORBIT stands today: deep liquidity of $11.74K, 47,389 wallets holding and an established 952-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $11.74K pool stands up well to a ~$26.55K cap — depth like that means ORBIT absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 47,389-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ORBIT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
BLAST
One thing stands out on BLAST, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why BLAST is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, BLAST carries a $4.52K pool, 279,524 wallets holding and an established record at 836 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $4.52K pool against a ~$2.64M cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so BLAST's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A holder base of 279,524 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORBIT or BLAST?
By tracked market cap: ORBIT (Blast) measures $26.55K and BLAST (Blast) measures $2.64M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORBIT or BLAST?
On the contract checks we publish: ORBIT (Blast) grades A and BLAST (Blast) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORBIT and BLAST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show ORBIT at −7.35% and BLAST at −46.9%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.