HostORDER vs RDNT — price, size and safety, side by side
ORDER (Arbitrum) vs RDNT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
ORDER vs RDNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ORDER | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03159 | $0.0005408 |
| Market cap | $17.30M | $894.13K |
| 24h volume | $16.27K DEX | $49.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $120.66K | $73.56K |
| FDV | $466.73K | $601.67K |
| Holders | 6,656 | 101,328 |
| Age (days) | 431 | 1,216 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- ORDER measures ~19× the market cap of RDNT
- ORDER measures ~1.6× the liquidity of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of ORDER
- RDNT measures ~15× the holder count of ORDER
- over the shared window ORDER moved −16.0% while RDNT moved +12.8%
What the data says
ORDER
ORDER at 0x4e200fe2f3efb977d5fd9c430a41531fb04d97b8 is the Arbitrum deployment of Orderly Network's token, 431 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $17.3 million market cap sits far above a $466.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 11.3 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $120.7 thousand of tracked depth on $32.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working but modest slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices a $894.1 thousand market cap across 101,328 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $73.6 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORDER or RDNT?
By tracked market cap: ORDER (Arbitrum) measures $17.30M and RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $894.13K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORDER or RDNT?
On the contract checks we publish: ORDER (Arbitrum) grades B and RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORDER and RDNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ORDER at −16.0% and RDNT at +12.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.