HostPAC vs ESE — price, size and safety, side by side
PAC (Blast) vs ESE (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
PAC vs ESE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| PAC | ESE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001155 | $0.0008439 |
| Market cap | $120.93K | $752.15K |
| 24h volume | $286.57 DEX | $6.52 DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.57K | $867.75 |
| FDV | $9.45K | $15.95K |
| Holders | 97,780 | 42,894 |
| Age (days) | 939 | 397 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- ESE measures ~6.2× the market cap of PAC
- PAC measures ~1.8× the liquidity of ESE
- PAC measures ~44× the 24h volume of ESE
- PAC measures ~2.3× the holder count of ESE
What the data says
PAC
Right at the foundation, PAC does both of the things you'd hope to see. With minting impossible at the contract level, the supply stays a firm ceiling, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. That's why PAC sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
On liquidity and holders, PAC shows workable liquidity of $1.57K, a holder base of 97,780 and 939 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $120.93K, the $1.57K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 97,780-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
ESE
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on ESE to flag. Right now ESE's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. It's the main reason the read sits at 34/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, ESE carries thin liquidity of $868, a holder base of 42,894 and an established record at 397 days as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $868 pool against a ~$752.15K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so ESE's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. 42,894 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PAC or ESE?
By tracked market cap: PAC (Blast) measures $120.93K and ESE (Blast) measures $752.15K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PAC or ESE?
On the contract checks we publish: PAC (Blast) grades A and ESE (Blast) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PAC and ESE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show PAC at −6.86% and ESE at −9.63%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.