HostPAYAI vs HUMA — price, size and safety, side by side
PAYAI (Solana) vs HUMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
PAYAI vs HUMA — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| PAYAI | HUMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007849 | $0.02741 |
| Market cap | $10.29M | $55.57M |
| 24h volume | $585.45K DEX | $2.83M DEX |
| Liquidity | $447.54K | $703.26K |
| FDV | $10.29M | $14.64M |
| Holders | 5,932 | 4,721 |
| Age (days) | — | 501 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- HUMA measures ~5.4× the market cap of PAYAI
- HUMA measures ~1.6× the liquidity of PAYAI
- HUMA measures ~4.8× the 24h volume of PAYAI
- over the shared window PAYAI moved −21.3% while HUMA moved −10.4%
What the data says
PAYAI
PAYAI is the token of PayAI — a Solana payments-infrastructure project in the agent-payments space, building rails for AI agents to pay each other. The mint PAYmo6moDF3Ro3X6bU2jwe2UdBnBhv8YjLgL1j4DxGu is what our scan tracks: $10.3 million market cap, $448 thousand of liquidity and 5,932 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The honest thesis: agent-payments is a real emerging problem — x402-style protocols are being built by serious companies — and PayAI is one of the crypto-native attempts at the same rails. That also names the risk: if Coinbase or the payment majors own the standard, crypto-native alternatives fight for the remainder. Real niche, competitive odds.
HUMA
There's a lot to like about how HUMA's contract is set up. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why HUMA earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
Looking at the market data, HUMA shows $703.26K of on-chain liquidity, 4,721 wallets holding and an established 501-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $703.26K of depth beside roughly $55.57M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. 4,721 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PAYAI or HUMA?
By tracked market cap: PAYAI (Solana) measures $10.29M and HUMA (BNB Chain) measures $55.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PAYAI or HUMA?
On the contract checks we publish: PAYAI (Solana) grades A and HUMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PAYAI and HUMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show PAYAI at −21.3% and HUMA at −10.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.