HostPLAY vs ELIZAOS — price, size and safety, side by side
PLAY (Base) vs ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-16.
PLAY vs ELIZAOS — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| PLAY | ELIZAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01763 | $0.0003967 |
| Market cap | $11.67M | $5.07M |
| 24h volume | $1.06M DEX | $3.94M DEX |
| Liquidity | $301.30K | $168.09K |
| FDV | $124.98M | $1.05M |
| Holders | 6,454 | 3,962 |
| Age (days) | 140 | 325 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PLAY measures ~2.3× the market cap of ELIZAOS
- PLAY measures ~1.8× the liquidity of ELIZAOS
- ELIZAOS measures ~3.7× the 24h volume of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~1.6× the holder count of ELIZAOS
What the data says
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ELIZAOS
Right at the foundation, ELIZAOS does both of the things you'd hope to see. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. So the A here (92/100, 2026-10-09) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On liquidity and holders, ELIZAOS shows a $168.09K pool, a holder base of 3,962 and a maturing 325-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $5.07M, the $168.09K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. 3,962 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of ELIZAOS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PLAY or ELIZAOS?
By tracked market cap: PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M and ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) measures $5.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PLAY or ELIZAOS?
On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Base) grades A and ELIZAOS (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PLAY and ELIZAOS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show PLAY at −40.0% and ELIZAOS at −37.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.