HostPSOL vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
PSOL (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
PSOL vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| PSOL | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $114.99 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $192.47M | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $871.98K DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $192.47M | $51.57M |
| Holders | 114,519 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PSOL measures ~3.7× the market cap of JUICED
- JUICED measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of PSOL
- PSOL measures ~31× the holder count of JUICED
What the data says
PSOL
pSOL is what happens when the stake button lives inside the wallet everyone already uses. Phantom — the default wallet of a huge share of Solana users — put one-tap staking in front of its user base, and pSOL, at mint pSo1f9nQXWgXibFtKf7NWYxb5enAM4qfP6UJSiXRQfL, is the receipt. The distribution shows it: 114,519 holders as of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, third-most of any liquid staking token this site tracks, across roughly $192.5 million of stake — an average position measured in hundreds of dollars, not hundreds of thousands. This is the retail LST.
That consumer profile is pSOL's most meaningful safety property, in both directions. Positively: ownership this dispersed can't be destabilized by any single exit, and Phantom's incentive to keep its in-wallet product boring and reliable is existential — a staking scandal inside the wallet would cost far more than the product earns. The trade-off: many pSOL holders tapped a button without learning what a liquid staking token is, so it's worth saying plainly — pSOL's price floats against SOL, can dip below backing in stressed markets, and full redemption runs on staking timelines, not instantly.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PSOL or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: PSOL (Solana) measures $192.47M and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PSOL or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: PSOL (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PSOL and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show PSOL at +1.97% and JUICED at +0.55%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.