HostQI vs PNG — price, size and safety, side by side
QI (Avalanche) vs PNG (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
QI vs PNG — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| QI | PNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002601 | $0.02868 |
| Market cap | $19.92M | $7.62M |
| 24h volume | $22.54K DEX | $28.24K DEX |
| Liquidity | $232.38K | $205.74K |
| FDV | $19.92M | $17.15M |
| Holders | 39,822 | 38,850 |
| Age (days) | 1,838 | 1,874 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- QI measures ~2.6× the market cap of PNG
- over the shared window QI moved +85.0% while PNG moved −0.52%
What the data says
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $19.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $232.4 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
PNG
PNG at 0x60781c2586d68229fde47564546784ab3faca982 is Pangolin's DEX token — the governance asset of one of Avalanche's original community exchanges, 1,856 days into its record and one of the longest-tracked deployments in this index. The October 9, 2026 snapshot counts 38,850 holders around a $7.6 million market cap, with a $17.2 million fully-diluted figure on 538.0 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The contract posture is the clean kind this index prints: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the locked set that earns the grade. The holder book is broader than the cap suggests — the ten largest wallets hold 85.2% of supply, the treasury-heavy shape of a launch-era DEX token — and $205.7 thousand of workable depth sees $122.1 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QI or PNG?
By tracked market cap: QI (Avalanche) measures $19.92M and PNG (Avalanche) measures $7.62M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QI or PNG?
On the contract checks we publish: QI (Avalanche) grades A and PNG (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QI and PNG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show QI at +85.0% and PNG at −0.52%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.