HostQUICK vs MEBT — price, size and safety, side by side
QUICK (Polygon) vs MEBT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
QUICK vs MEBT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| QUICK | MEBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007273 | $2.59 |
| Market cap | $7.05M | — |
| 24h volume | $38.49K DEX | $87.41K DEX |
| Liquidity | $280.38K | $261.64K |
| FDV | $8.35M | $4.44M |
| Holders | 54,042 | 7,115 |
| Age (days) | 1,454 | 126 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of QUICK
- QUICK measures ~7.6× the holder count of MEBT
- over the shared window QUICK moved −24.0% while MEBT moved −15.3%
What the data says
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $7.0 million market cap prices most of the $8.4 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $280.4 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot — with 7,115 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $261.6 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUICK or MEBT?
By tracked market cap: QUICK (Polygon) measures $7.05M and MEBT (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUICK or MEBT?
On the contract checks we publish: QUICK (Polygon) grades A and MEBT (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUICK and MEBT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show QUICK at −24.0% and MEBT at −15.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.