HostQUID vs BLUECHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
QUID (Base) vs BLUECHIP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
QUID vs BLUECHIP — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| QUID | BLUECHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05992 | $0.005598 |
| Market cap | $10.28M | $8.05M |
| 24h volume | $534.41K DEX | $518.66K DEX |
| Liquidity | $436.06K | $408.37K |
| FDV | $71.83M | $8.05M |
| Holders | 14,990 | 4,115 |
| Age (days) | 16 | 41 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- QUID measures ~3.6× the holder count of BLUECHIP
- over the shared window QUID moved −8.12% while BLUECHIP moved −58.1%
What the data says
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the October 6, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
BLUECHIP
BLUECHIP at 0xb200000000000000000000cfbdf64a8706a94a01 is a Base asset 26 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $8.1 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply — a name doing heavy lifting on a very young book.
The launch-window book is real: $408.4 thousand of deep tracked depth on $567.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that most of the tape cycles daily. Everything else is unwritten: no holder distribution in the snapshot, no contract-level controls assessed. A name that claims quality and a record still proving it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUID or BLUECHIP?
By tracked market cap: QUID (Base) measures $10.28M and BLUECHIP (Base) measures $8.05M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUID or BLUECHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: QUID (Base) grades A and BLUECHIP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUID and BLUECHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show QUID at −8.12% and BLUECHIP at −58.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.