HostQUID vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side
QUID (Base) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-15.
QUID vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| QUID | FUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05992 | $5.45 |
| Market cap | $10.28M | — |
| 24h volume | $534.41K DEX | $23.79K DEX |
| Liquidity | $436.06K | $2.31M |
| FDV | $71.83M | $246.38M |
| Holders | 14,990 | 31,265 |
| Age (days) | 16 | 121 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~5.3× the liquidity of QUID
- QUID measures ~22× the 24h volume of FUN
- FUN measures ~2.1× the holder count of QUID
- over the shared window QUID moved −8.12% while FUN moved −31.9%
What the data says
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the October 6, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $246.4 million market cap against $2.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUID or FUN?
By tracked market cap: QUID (Base) measures $10.28M and FUN (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUID or FUN?
On the contract checks we publish: QUID (Base) grades A and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUID and FUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show QUID at −8.12% and FUN at −31.9%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.